Child Second Language Acquisition

Running head : CHILD L2 ACQUISITIONChild stake linguistic communication Acquisitionand its Similarities toAdult act Language AcquisitionDoes sister flash vocabulary (cL2 ) achievement mark off adult indorse manner of spe equivalentg (aL2 ) attainment or does it contend common properties with first language (L1 ) achievement ? This is a top dog that Meisel (2004 ) has tried to clarify in his (p . 55 ) and this is the question this pass judgment on would attempt to answerBased on the existing body of books on second language learnedness , this sets forth the proposal of marriage : Second language (L2 acquisition of children is more comparable to second language (L2 acquisition of adults than to first language (L1 ) acquisition . consequently , the akinities of child L2 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition will b e presented , discussed and examined beneath . These similarities , which are taken from the findings of research studies conducted by linguistic researchers such as Meisel (2004 , Marinis (2007 , Guasti (2004 ) among others , are group into four categoriesFirst , cL2 acquisition is similar to aL2 acquisition in the area of grammatical scholarship curiously in the domain of morphology and syntax . This actor that second language acquisition of children is similar to second language acquisition of adults in terms of the forms and positions of verbs personad in sentences . This point is contain by the results in Pienemann (1981 , cited in Meisel , 2004 . Meisel (2004 presented specific grammatical features that make believe this through the results of a cross-sectional study involving 14 children with ages 5 to 7 years old who were bilingual German- French learners and monolingual French learners (p . 60 ) and a quasi-longitudinal study involving 35 children who were sort a ccording to the length of their exposure to ! French (p .64 . The findings of the studies showed that (a L2 children are akin L2 adults who bulge bounded verbs in the correct position . That is , L2 children use up finite verb forms where it is required (p .

61- 62 (b ) Second language children stupefy the French non-clitic beats in preverbal position adjacent to the verb just bid well what L2 adults do (p . 67 (c ) Child L2 learners integrate hellion finite verbs as well as a subject clitic with countless verb forms which adult L2 learners also exhibit (p . 67 (d ) L2 children combine two finite verbs rather than combining finite elements with mul titudinous thematic verbs which is similar to L2 adults behavior (p . 69 (e ) Second Language children prove the same behavior of combining subject clitics with countless verb forms as that of second language adults (p 69 (f ) Child L2 learners billet the negator non before the verb to be negated like adult L2 learners do (p . 71However , it is turn on to note that in the light of this similarity of cL2 and aL2 in the acquisition of the morphological and syntactical domain , some researchers do not agree in their findings with the results of the studies of other researchers . For one , the conclusions of Meisel (2004 ) state that it is just now in the morphological domain that child L2 is like aL2 (p...If you lead to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay