'DCQ Sontag Essay\r'

' icon fetching visual aspects us the world, solely unaccompanied the world the photographer creates. According to Sontag, photos show that we ascertain through a photo in the way we hear the opinion. Seeing photos usher bulge out contrast our sense because we only fascinate the picture non whats personnel casualty on around it. In some other words the viewer only sees what’s in spite of appearance the frame. Images allowed us to see situations that occurred; however, it is extremely special in what the audience tail see. I qualify Sontag’s claim that picture taking limits our understanding of the world because nil is picture perfect. A picture is just a snapshot or quick image of something distorted.\r\nPhotography has accomplished the task of domainipulation to the point where images do not read the honesty. In general photography is used to trick the audience’s eyes. For example, ads atomic number 18 displayed every twenty-four hours in our lives distorting the honesty portrayed. ample ago when a prat commercial came on they had enhanced the color, and edited all the little enlarge that appeals to our emotions, making cig atomic number 18ttes look good. The only problem is cigarette isn’t good for anyone, plainly the viewers wouldn’t get that message due to the changes the photographers have made. pastime this further Sontag infers that postal code that comes from a photo can really be understood. The reason for that is because photography shows everything hardly context. Photography gives mountain a small glance of reality, but the realities have been manipulated to the photographer’s idealism.\r\n further as Sontag pointed out photography possesss the gaps in our rational pictures and replaces them. Photograph gives proof and confirms the past, but it does not exhibit the honesty a citizen would have lived through. For example if no pictures were captured during the Holocaust time period, it would be hard for people to believe that all the torturing actually occurred. Images allowed us to get a glimpse of what the Jews went through but the feelings and emotions aren’t the same. One cannot say they genuinely understand how the Jews felt, without actually experiencing what the Jews did. It takes one to be there to ingest the emotions and tears the Jews had as the gas killed them and family.\r\nSontag says understanding can only come from what is shown.. There is much more(prenominal) to livelihood than what meets the eye, and this can be exemplified and proved in many different ways. Pretend that someone knows nothing about the tragic events that occurred on September 11, 2001. A photo is placed in front of Them. They take a look. It appears to be a man dressed to kill(p) in what appears to be in work robes but the thing that strikes their attention first, the thing that stands out most is that he is upside down. Odd they think. The cathode-ray o scilloscope behind the man is what looks to be a steel like structure. Maybe if their senses are sharp that day you’ll come to the conclusion that this is an image of a man who decided to end his life by spring eat up the top of a tall make while in midair.\r\nHowever, did the photograph show them what was going on around him? The edifice he jumped off of? A hijacked commercial airlines plane crashed into it leaving the building to go up in flames and ready to fall through with smoke pouring out the windows. Leaving him and at least 1,000 other people trapped on the high floors of the tower. This man, this falling man, was surrounded by arrogant chaos, destruction, death, a living hell, but they would never know. He looks so calm, so serene even though he is more than well aware that his life is about to end in a reckon of seconds. To the person looking at the photo they only see it as Sontag says they do. Through what they see in the picture, not what is really occur ring.\r\nTo an extent, yes, photography does limit us in the view of the world like Sontag refers to. Pictures are taken by photographers who chose what they beseech to express and how they wish life to appear to be. By doing this, reality has changed, seemly manipulated into something that it truly is not. It is now a reality created from the benignant brainpower, influenced by its wants, desires and emotions. Photography also fails to give us background, or deeper cognition about the photo. Pictures lack the emotion experienced by the person taking the picture (how hard it may have been to get the picture the photographer wanted). Yet pictures can sometimes heighten an emotional response (a gruesome death, a owing(p) sunset). Pictures lend to a great understanding of what is occurrent around the world.\r\nWhen someone sees the faces of others in places they never bequeath travel to, they start to understand the emotion they show. row sometimes can not do referee to the things you are able to see. Pictures only help the referee better understand his/her meaning of what is actually taking place. Yet, do not be fooled by everything you see today. Technology has taken photography to a refreshed level. Make certain you trust your source first. The gray saying â€Å"Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear” no longer peal true. Be skeptical, but keep your eyes and mind open at the same time.\r\nQualifying Sontag, a individual photograph of an event, place, time or any(prenominal) will only give you a limited perspective of that event, place or whatever. However it does not limit our understanding of something. It simply gives a single viewpoint or snapshot for us to home an overall understanding. Susan Sontag claims in her passage, â€Å"On Photography”, that photography limits our understanding of the world. However, the truth is that photography enhanced our understanding of the world. It allows us to see things that would be otherwise infeasible to see. Sontag argues that photography does not allow people to truly understand things and that it does not teach any honest or political knowledge. The truth is that it deepens our understanding and expands our knowledge of the world around us. Without photography, people would have no idea of what surrounded them and what happened before their time. Photography produces a visual history of the world, thus producing a greater appreciation for it.\r\n'