Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Why College Athletes Should Be salaried$53.4 Million the combined fee of the croak 15 pay offing(a) coaches in function 1 college footb e rattling(prenominal), $0 the combined salary of all student-supporters. Over the past hardly a(prenominal) decades, college athletics chip in gained popularity across the join States. Whether it is football, basketball, or baseball, ever since the turn of the century, extramural sports subscribe brought in a additional of r tied(p)ue to their respective Universities. A new-fangled study found that the University of Texas acrobatic design had the highest revenue of any other University at a little over $ one hundred twenty million. Yet with this large sum of money, NO college athletes ar legally compensated for their work. consort to NCAA rules, You argon non eligible for elaboration in a sport if you have ever Taken net income or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport. part it may seem odd and unsporting to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of much(prenominal) athletes is a necessity non precisely to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, nevertheless also to encourage students to graduate and pull their college degrees. Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they be the sole reason for the Athletic Programs surplus in revenue. These athletes be functional for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work.everyplace else athletes are paid, so why shouldnt college students too? Some critics may moot that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The minor confederation for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the groups revenue. Also, with all the beat practicing and working in the classroom, how legion(predicate) athletes have time to truly quarter a commerce? Another argument that supports paying college athletes is that these full-ride scholarships given over to the best athletes do not actually cover all their expenses. Many athletes unflurried cant afford to have their parents come to the stadium and watch the games. With all of the respect and publicity of these athletes, it goes unnoticed that a great deal of the players live very near to the poverty line. Due to this neglect of money, black-markets are created. Here, boosters that represent the University give these players cars, disbursal money, or anything they truly motivation, and in return, these players go to their respective University.There have been many instances of this before, one prominent example is that of Reggie chaparral, the cut back for the University of Southern California from 2003-2005. Bush was paid by boosters to attend USC, which vi olate NCAA rules. Bushs mother was having derange paying rent for her apartment at the time in Pasadena. Bush matte obligated to take this offer, as thither was no other way to afford money and pay for his mothers home. These boosters actions are not unless when are illegal, further create unfairness in competition amongst the NCAA. These universities that violate NCAA rules have an pep pill edge in recruiting top prospects. Schools are then tempted to violate much(prenominal) rules to even out the playing field.The last and arguably the most important reason to pay college athletes, is that it impart ensure that most student-athletes get out pick up their college degrees. Paying student-athletes would provide an fillip to stay in school and complete their degree programs, instead of leaving primordial for the professional unions Which brings me back to the question, Should college athletes get paid? If athletes are paid to play, not only can they cover some of their college expenses that scholarships couldnt, but also now they will wishing to finish their education. NCAA prides itself on all student-athletes are students first and athletes second, however, it seems that more popular athletes come out early for the pros.In college basketball, many entrant stars are referred to as one and through players as they complete one year of college and go to the professional leagues early, as they want money and need it as short as possible. The importance of their education is lost. The University seems to be hypocritical in its actions when it doesnt pay its athletes, because it seems they support college athletes leaving for the Professional league early. One author suggests that every university pays the very(prenominal) flat rate to each college athlete for three years, and then offer a raise to senior athletes. This bonus will create that incentive for students to receive their degrees. bandage it may seem odd and raw to pay college athletes , the reality is that compensation of such athletes is a necessity not only to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, but also to encourage students to graduate and get their college degrees. The truth of the matter is that many college athletes are already being paid chthonian the table which creates a black-market that is not only illegal, but is also unfair to universities that abide by NCAA regulations. Universities are exploiting these students and allowing them not to receive any revenue that they understandably earned. College Athletes Should Be PaidWorks CitedCollege Athletics. Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_athletics. counterpart of Informational Hearing College Athletes. Sacramento, CA, Senate Publications, 2003.